Re: Re: svn: / pecl/pdo_4d/trunk/config.m4 pecl/pdo_ibm/trunk/config.m4 pecl/pdo_informix/trunk/config.m4 pecl/pdo_user/trunk/config.m4
php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_2/acinclude.m4 php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_2/configure.in php/php-src/branches

From: Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:46:00 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: svn: / pecl/pdo_4d/trunk/config.m4 pecl/pdo_ibm/trunk/config.m4 pecl/pdo_informix/trunk/config.m4 pecl/pdo_user/trunk/config.m4
php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_2/acinclude.m4 php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_2/configure.in php/php-src/branches
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-46186@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On 25.11.2009, at 13:43, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 25.11.2009 13:36, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
Wouldn't following recommendations printed in warnings help?
Sure, but only for newer autoconf versions. Which means we would break autoconf 2.13 if we follow them.
Is that a problem for trunk, for example? All modern systems have newer autoconf-versions. And trunk means +1 year from now, at least
All new autoconf versions suck. Only properly working version is 2.13. Please, it works, leave it alone. There are more important things to worry about. --Jani

« previous php.internals (#46186) next »