Re: php id string
| From: | Jess Portnoy | Date: | Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:49:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: php id string | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-46232@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Apple ships their MAC OS with GCC that is capable of building universal binaries.
Most MAC users expect packages to be built universal. Trust me, I also hate it but its true...
If what you want is just to ensure the extensions are built for the same architecture as the PHP core, this I can understand, I'm just saying you need to take multiple archs bundled together under consideration. Also, I don't know if deciding for the dynamic loader if something can be loaded is so wise, if it can great, if not, it will yell at you anyhow..
May the source be with you,
Best regards,
Jess Portnoy
jvlad wrote:
"Jess Portnoy" <jess@zend.com> wrote in message news:4B1266E0.7010405@zend.com...Jess, Current platform plays no role. If it can't run a particular php build, there is nothing to care of. What I do care of is ABA which depends on the compile-time arch and nothing else. It's my understanding that id-string is a part of the technology to make sure that extensions are compatible with core. -jvladPerhaps it would be wise to display both the build arch and the current arch on which its running? I used the Darwin/MAC universal build example before but even on Windows and *nix as well when you think about it, one can run a 32bit binary on a 64bit OS, usually provided the stack below [Apache, etc] is also 32 bit. So, unlike the PHP_COMPILER_ID check, which makes sense as the various VCs are declared as not quite compatible, I think in the case of different archs this would be a mistake, just displaying the gathered arch info I can see no harm in though... May the source be with you, Best regards, Jess Portnoy Pierre Joye wrote:This info is available in phpinfo on windows and I would like to add it in the "php -v" output as well. I'm not sure how we can safely rely on this info on other platforms but that's definitively something we should try to do. Cheers, On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:29 AM, jvlad <dmda@yandex.ru> wrote:hi,Starting with version 5.3 php checks id string when it loads the extensions to match its own one and it also shows this string in PHP Extension Build line of phpinfo(). That's great. This line contains api#, threadsafe, and compiler. So it's almost all important thigs to check and make sure that a particular module is binary-compatible with php core. All things, except just one, the CPU. It's known that Windows runs on many CPUs, Solaris runs fine under sparc, sparc64, x86, and x86_64. Needless to mention linux and *bsd systems (I guess they are running on everything). Why not to add what phpinfo() shows in Architecture, to the id string? Are there any reasons not to do this? -jvlad -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpHi all,