Re: Proposal: allow for includes in php.ini

From: Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:08:43 +0000
Subject: Re: Proposal: allow for includes in php.ini
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-46510@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
i am fine with both too. i just think it's sorely lacking to be able to do it any other time than at compile time -and- that only provides you one location. could be very powerful to allow for any location to be scanned for ini files. 2009/12/23 Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com>: > On 23-Dec-2009, at 21:47, Johannes Schlüter <johannes@schlueters.de> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 04:40 -0800, Michael Shadle wrote: >>> >>> NOTE: I just remembered there -is- a config-file-scan-dir option at >>> compile time. However, what about doing away with this and making it >>> inline in php.ini, the syntax can match mysql, as it uses ini files as >>> well. >> >> I think the --with-config-file-scan-dir is the perfect thing for this, >> having includes means having wild dependencies ... and to answer to your >> example: Ubuntu would still have to edit a php.ini file to add a new >> include, with scan dir: add a file,restart server, done. >> >> johannes >> >> > Why not have both? Combining these two methods allow for more flexibility, > though if anything I would vote for wildcards in include statements to make > it more powerful. >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >

« previous php.internals (#46510) next »