Re: Re: #50634 [Opn->Asn]: 'Core' introduced in 5.3.1
| From: | Richard Quadling | Date: | Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:49:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: #50634 [Opn->Asn]: 'Core' introduced in 5.3.1 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-46606@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2010/1/4 Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net>:
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Richard Quadling
>> <rquadling@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I can see that the key went from "internal" to "mhash" at V5.3.0
>>> and
>>> from "mhash" to "Core" at V5.3.1 on Windows.
>>>
>>> Is this also true for non-windows please?
>>> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50634 says "Windows
>>> or linux", but on
>>> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49223 Jani says this
>>> "Seems to be
>>> windows only issue.".
>>
>> Does it apply only to mhash or does it happen for other exts as well?
>>
>> It may be due to the hack to make mhash visible as extension while not
>> existing anymore (BC layer provided by hash).
>>
>
> It only happened when mhash was a shared extension afaik, and since most
> of the time on Linux its static it never showed up there.
>
> The mhash thing was a bug and it should have been internal in 5.2 and Core
> in 5.3.
>
> Scott
>
Normally we don't document bugs, but since the change to 5.3.0 was
supposed to be "internal" => "Core", I think this instance warrants
the documentation of the bug.
How best to document this?
<refsect1 role="changelog">
&reftitle.changelog;
<para>
<informaltable>
<tgroup cols="2">
<thead>
<row>
<entry>&Version;</entry>
<entry>&Description;</entry>
</row>
</thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry>5.3.1</entry>
<entry>
Windows only : Core constants are categorized under
<literal>Core</literal>,
previously <literal>mhash</literal>.
</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>5.3.0</entry>
<entry>
Core constants are categorized under <literal>Core</literal>,
previously <literal>internal</literal>. On Windows, the Core Constants
are categorized under <literal>mhash</literal>.
</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>5.0.0</entry>
<entry>
The <parameter>categorize</parameter> parameter was added.
</entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</informaltable>
</para>
</refsect1>
Is acceptable?
--
-----
Richard Quadling
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
EE : http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_248814.html
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
ZOPA : http://uk.zopa.com/member/RQuadling