Re: Re: svn: /php/php-src/ branches/PHP_5_2/NEWS branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/AUTHORS branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/ChangeLog
branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/HACKING branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/LICENCE branches/PH
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:32:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: svn: /php/php-src/ branches/PHP_5_2/NEWS branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/AUTHORS branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/ChangeLog branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/HACKING branches/PHP_5_2/ext/pcre/pcrelib/LICENCE branches/PH |
||
| Groups: | php.internals | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-46905@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as I remember, it was decided that C99 is ok for php6.
I can't remember any decision about C99.
> Anyway, we probably need to compose some table on what compilers have limited (and how limited)
> support for c99.
> Then we can objectively decide if we can leave those aside
That's not a solution, or we kill solaris, HPUX, windows, etc.
support. GCC does a very bad job here by enabling part of C99 by
default and breaking the other half of the specs. Also C99 is pretty
much a bastarized version of C++ in an incompatible way. The price to
accept C99 is too high, especially when all we use (in 99.99999% of
what the usages) is stdint/stdbool.
Simply detect and define them at configure time will kill the need to
use c99 and keeps us on the good/right side (what I do on win for
example,easy) :)
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org