Re: PHP 5.4 branch and trunk
| From: | Jan Schneider | Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:50:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 5.4 branch and trunk | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-47350@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Zitat von Johannes Schlüter <johannes@php.net>:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 22:13 +0100, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:How about 5.3.99? A lot of projects use this for pre-releases, but it still might make sense. Jan. -- Do you need professional PHP or Horde consulting? http://horde.org/consulting/On 16.03.2010, at 16:58, Derick Rethans wrote:Before we add features, they need to be discussed whether we want to have them. As version name for it I would like to use "trunk-dev" (and not 5.4-dev or 6.0-dev) as we're not quite sure where this is moving. Right now, there are the following features that I can see we should think about:Since we do not know the name of the next version yet, maybe its best to base the name on what version it will have as a predecessor and add support for this in version_compare()? Something like "5.3post". Ok this isnt a good suggestion, but I hope you get what I am suggesting.We need a version number which can be represented as a numeric value like #define PHP_VERSION_ID 50303 to help extension authors; as said on IRC 5.4 is the only sane choice there. We can still increase the number if needed. How to document this is a good question...