Re: FPM RFC
| From: | Michael Shadle | Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:30:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: FPM RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-47615@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2010/3/25 Jérôme Loyet <jerome@loyet.net>:
> ** Default Section **
> Talking about redundancy. When there is more than one pool, there is
> several parameters which remain the same. Why should we type them
> several time ? The idea is to define a special pool, which will not be
> started but only be used as a "template" with default values for other
> pools. Common parameters will be set in the default pool and in each
> pool only specifics parameters will be set. here some example in the
> two previous cases
Redundancy can be addressed by includes.
I was thinking of creating an RFC for php.ini file support of
includes, but FPM should support includes either - whether it is it's
own INI file, the same XML file it's always been, whatever.
It should be added to the FPM RFC.