Re: [RFC] FPM INI syntax

On 04/13/2010 12:01 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:

At 21:46 13/04/2010, Christopher Jones wrote:

Jérôme Loyet wrote:

Le 13 avril 2010 20:17, Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com> a écrit :

Jérôme Loyet wrote:

Hi guys, As dreamcast4 advises me in the previous FPM conversation, I just wrote the RFC for the FPM INI syntax. It can be read here: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/fpm/ini_syntax Tell me what you think. ++ Jerome

I think the RFC should clearly state what is new generic php.ini functionality (e.g. include) and what is specific for FPM.

for me everything is specific to FPM

How is "include" specific to FPM?

What he means is that it'll be implemented in the custom code responsible for parsing fpm.ini, and not in the ZE .ini parser which would be the layer below it. Implementing include() can be done at either layer. If it's implemented at the bottom layer (ZE) then it'll transparently effect any and all .ini's - not sure we want that (maybe). If we implement it at the top layer - the custom code that's responsible for fpm.ini, then it will be entirely specific to it and won't effect php.ini behavior in any way (exactly like the support for the 'extension' keyword is implemented for php.ini, but not for any other .ini's - because it's at the top custom-code layer). Zeev

Thanks Zeev. Jérôme should add this clarification to the RFC. Chris -- Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com Tel: +1 650 506 8630 Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ Free PHP Book: http://tinyurl.com/ugpomhome