Re: [RFC] Performance improvements

On 20.04.2010 12:41, Derick Rethans wrote: >>> You're writing that the ZEND_CATCH opcode has to be used with a constant >>> class name, so how would "catch ( self $e )" be represented in op-codes now? >> >> I dropped such possibility. Does someone use it? >> For me it looks useless. If it's really necessary I can try not to drop it. > > You have a point, it looks quite useless. But of course, I am sure > somebody has used this :) FWIW, Google Code Search returns no such thing as far as I could see, it obviously doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but if it triggers a parse error or something clear enough to the eventual unlucky guy that did use it, I guess it might be an acceptable BC break. Cheers, Jordi

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc