Re: Type hinting

From: Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:34:33 +0000
Subject: Re: Type hinting
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-48533@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, I have only recently started listening in on this list and I usually find it quite interesting. This one especially so. But I think it's going nowhere...forgive me for saying so. I believe that those of you, who'll have a say in this decision, have already made their minds up and they can't come up with arguments to convince the other party... Maybe it'd help to summarize those arguments in a few concise words instead of lengthy paragraphs, if that's even possible. Also it'd be nice to know the exact goals of this new syntax, be it strict- or autocast- types. Goal of typed scalar function parameters: + Type-Safety within function (granted by both) + Self-documenting Code (granted by both) + ... Pro strict-type-enforcing: + Precise Errors/Warnings + Prevents data-dependent errors + ... Pro autocast-type-hinting: + Code-readability/compactness + Convenient + The PHP-way + ... Feel free to add any arguments to the list...;) Cheers Lars

« previous php.internals (#48533) next »