Re: Version management
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:07:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Version management | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-49306@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net> wrote:
> Am 10.08.2010 17:14, schrieb Derick Rethans:
>> I think our current way work pretty well. There is 5.2 which is
>> security-fix supported, 5.3 that is supported and trunk/5.4 that's on
>> the way to alpha.
>
> This only works if manage to keep the time between "new code is
> committed to trunk" and "new code is released" under a year. Otherwise
> developers get frustrated.
>
> If we manage to release a PHP 5.X.0 release every year, we are a lot
> more predictable. Which is good for downstream as well.
That's exactly what I keep asking. It also requires some changes about
features addition in stable releases, bugs fixes and release life
cycles. All these words sounds like a nightmare to Derick&co, but
that's something we have to go through. It is the only way to have
controllable and plan-able releases (for us, our users and the
distros).
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org