Re: Re: More formal feature request cycle

Formality, in any of its forms, is about as far from PHP or this project as you could possibly get. John On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Alec <alecgorge@gmail.com> wrote: > This could be good. A custom built site where people can vote for and > against (and maybe neutral) something and then post their reasoning. > > Open discussion could still take place on internals, but a site that would > provide a quick summary would be handy. So RFC wiki page + user registration > tied to an email (preferably the one used on internals) + voting. > > We are all PHP people, whipping something up shouldn't be too hard :D . > > On 9/15/2010 9:36 PM, James Butler wrote: >> >> This thought is brought on mainly by watching the annotations drama that >> is currently occupying internals, does anyone else agree it might be a good >> idea to have a slightly more formal procedure for requesting features and >> then recording votes pros, cons, side effects, etc. against it. It might do >> a fair bit to stop anecdotal talk of how many people actually want a >> feature, and stop the list retreading the same arguments over and over >> again. Have no idea just yet what this would look like, but an thinking >> something between launchpad and the current php wiki. >> >> -- >> James Butler >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >