Re: Re: deprecation status of $str{42} versus $str[42], revisited
| From: | Philip Olson | Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:53:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: deprecation status of $str{42} versus $str[42], revisited | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-49800@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 23 September 2010 21:39, Arvids Godjuks <arvids.godjuks@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think leave both ways, because it's really much of the code uses actually
>> {4} rather than [4] for strings.
>> But please do the substr functionality as it was suggested a few years
>> before. That makes perfect sense :)
>>
>
> Are there any further thoughts on this thread? Even though {} is a
> small and likely uninteresting topic, it would be nice to actually
> (finally, until we change our minds) come to a conclusion and unite
> the code with the docs.
Was going to wait a week (we're close enough) but this thread (and past ones) decided that
$str{42} is no longer deprecated, with hope that the syntax will be optimized by Chris, Andi, or
whoever scratches that itch in the future. The documentation will be updated.
Regards,
Philip