Re: BC break in 5.3.2 -> 5.3.3 with "parent::" and __call/__callStatic

On Oct 24 15:41:44, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > >class Bar { > > // override getFoo() to add some specific behaviour > > public function getFoo() { > > // do the specific stuff > > parent::getFoo(); > > } > >} > > I think you meant Bar to extend ActiveRecord? But anyway, I think > that this particular call should be done through __call, not > __callStatic, since it's basically non-static call. The line between > the two wasn't really well-defined in PHP (you could call static > methods non-statically and vice versa) which is a pity but I think > distinction can be made in this case. Exactly, if Bar::getFoo is not called statically, parent::getFoo() will not be a static call, it should not get through __callStatic. Best, > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch