Re: Implicit isset/isempty check on short-ternary operator
| From: | Ole Markus With | Date: | Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:45:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Implicit isset/isempty check on short-ternary operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-51855@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:04:06 +0200, Rune Kaagaard <rumi.kg@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey again Updated here as always https://gist.github.com/909711. I've tried to write down the goal of this new feature. Which patterns do we want to make easier to write? Do you agree with the goals I've set?I think these shortcuts could be really useful for array elements, but for other variables I am really sceptical and I think they would do more harm than good. Generally I do not really see any reason why a variable should not be 'instanciated' before use. So +1 if this shortcut is implemented to only work for array elements. -1 for any other variable type. -- Ole Markus With