Re: proposed access modifier "silent" ... was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Implicit isset/isempty check on short-ternary operator
| From: | Stas Malyshev | Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:04:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: proposed access modifier "silent" ... was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Implicit isset/isempty check on short-ternary operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-51874@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
It seems that there are no consensus about this feature so... *if in doubt, leave it out.*I don't see any serious objections to it except comments from people that seem not really understand what this feature is about and complain about "bad code" which has nothing to do with the actual feature proposed. I am all for consensus, but I have very hard time accepting it as a valid objection, sorry. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227