Re: Unmaintained SAPIs

All right ;-) Johannes: Thanks for details about lighhtpd's internals. Julien.P 2011/4/27 Johannes Schlüter <johannes@schlueters.de> > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 15:36 +0200, Julien Pauli wrote: > > I'm +1 with that list. > > > > I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible > > (haven't seen lighttpd API yet). If someone got the same idea, just > > tell it... > > lighty's API for that is FastCGI. There is an native API, but plugging > in PHP there would be bad in regards to lighty's event-based > architecture. > > > What about apache2filter SAPI ? > > What what? I didn't here from people who are using or maintaining it ... > so it's on the "i don't know" list. > > johannes > > > Julien.P > > > > 2011/4/24 Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> > > 2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>: > > > On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > > >> > > >> hi, > > >> > > >> Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? > > >> > > >> ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 > > release time), it > > >> is still used and works for users with custom versions. A > > new version > > >> may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm > > working on. > > > > > > Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. > > > > > > Not that it is so important (does not hurt anyone to keep it > > in) but > > apache 1.x is dead, not IIS :). > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Pierre > > > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | > > http://www.libgd.org > > > > -- > > > > > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: > > http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > >