Re: Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6?
| From: | Ferenc Kovacs | Date: | Wed, 18 May 2011 19:13:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-52450@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:
> PLEASE, let the dead horse be!
>>>>
>>>
>> Apparently, this horse is not as dead as some would like it to be :)
>>
>
> The horse is not dead or if so then no proper burial service was given.
> People are still waiting for the invitations and wanting to hear the eulogy.
>
> So, instead I'll make the following assumptions and engrave them into this
> topics tombstone:
>
> - short_open_tag is fully alive
> - short_open_tag is PHP_INI_SYSTEM|PHP_INI_PERDIR
> - all distributed php.ini files disable it (5.3+)
> - the default will be enabled, forever, unless #5 is used
> - --disable-short-tags will exist, forever
> - no new alternative syntax will be implemented, ever
>
> That's the situation people should understand and since this horse is
> considered dead I will:
>
> - update php.ini ini descriptions to reflect this
> - update documentation to reflect this
> - mark http://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags as declined
> - point to the declined rfc when people suggest these alternatives
>
> All discussion is over unless a human knows the above synopsis is false,
> because CVS has spoken. RIP.
>
>
apparently somebody else brought up the shortag(specifically the <?= tag)
topic again, and I've noticed that you moved the rfc from declined to "In
discussion" recently (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags?do=revisions), so I
would like to know that are these rules still hold, or did something
happened since this decision?
I couldn't find the suggested clarification in the docs either (maybe looked
at the wrong place)
Tyrael