Re: [VOTE] voting rfc
| From: | Philip Olson | Date: | Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:29:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] voting rfc | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-53482@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Jun 20, 2011, at 5:15 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Hi Internals,
>
> we have been working on getting an rfc together on how to deal with
> votes on rfcs. We aim to provide a simple mechaism for votes while
> still maintaining freedom on how to do votes and how to work on rfcs.
>
> I want to move forward on the voting and release RFCs, so we can move
> forward on the 5.4 process. Therefore I call for votes on the voting RFC.
>
> The RFC can be found here:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting
>
> You can vote here:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting/vote
>
> Votes are open until Monday 27.06.2011.
Please clarify the "who can vote" aspect of this RFC, which is:
"
The proposal here is for two audiences to participate in the voting process:
* People with php.net SVN accounts that have contributed code to PHP
* Representatives from the PHP community, that will be chosen by those with php.net SVN accounts
* Lead developers of PHP based projects (frameworks, cms, tools, etc.)
* regular participant of internals discussions
"
Does this mean that a php.net account holder must have 1+ commits? How are "Lead
developers" determined exactly? Do they nominate themselves? Does each name require an official
vote with a two week waiting period? And what's a "regular participant of internal
discussions?" One post per week/month/year? And only the internals@lists.php.net mailing list
applies?
I voted against this RFC partly because the above is not clear.
Regards,
Philip