Re: Big patch for FPM (config and initialization)
| From: | Michael Shadle | Date: | Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:07:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Big patch for FPM (config and initialization) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-53738@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
+1 the way for change is to add the new, add an E_DEPRECATED style
warning for a point release or two, and then nix it.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kiall Mac Innes <kiall@managedit.ie> wrote:
> FPM is still new, and only just getting the experimental flag removed, now
> is the only time to make any BC breaking cosmitic changes that will lead to
> less confusion in the long run..
>
> That said - I'm not sure about the diagnostics group name..
>
> Maybe allow for both the old and new naming on 5.4 and remove the old in
> 5.next...?
>
> Kiall
> On Jul 3, 2011 9:43 p.m., "Antony Dovgal" <tony@daylessday.org> wrote:
>> On 07/03/2011 04:50 AM, Giovanni Giacobbi wrote:
>>> Detailed changelog of the patch:
>>> - Renamed options "pm.status_path", "ping.path",
>>> "ping.response" into
>>> a new logical group "diagnostics", so they are now respectively:
>>> "diagnostics.status_path", "diagnostics.ping_path",
>>> "diagnostics.ping_response".
>>
>> I'm not quite sure renaming config options would help anybody, in my
> opinion it would do more harm than good.
>> I personally would certainly expect my existing config files to continue
> to work after upgrade to 5_4.
>> Yes, we're changing '3' to '4' in the version number, but that
>> doesn't
> mean we can just go ahead and break the config file.
>>
>> Other than that, looks ok to me (assuming you've tested it and does
> continue to work the way it worked before all those cosmetic changes).
>>
>> --
>> Wbr,
>> Antony Dovgal
>> ---
>> http://pinba.org - realtime profiling for PHP
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>