Re: sudden spike in wiki registrations
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:00:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: sudden spike in wiki registrations | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals php.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-53867@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:48, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Hannes Magnusson
>> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:03, Hannes Magnusson
>>> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> It is very hard to detect which "php group" a person belongs to, our
>>>> karma system doesn't work like that.
>>>>
>>>> We can easily detect if an account is an php.net SVN account though.
>>>> And the wiki can tell you if a person has write access to that specific page.
>>>>
>>>> Most external users have assigned "write" groups, "qa",
>>>> "rfc", "web".
>>>> These are the people who have requested access to these areas.
>>>>
>>>> I was under the impression the vote plugin respected the write
>>>> permission acl to that page, so a user would need to have write karma
>>>> to that namespace to be able to vote.
>>>> Does it have no builtin functionality like that?
>>>
>>> Answering my own question; No, it doesn't.
>>> http://www.dokuwiki.org/plugin:doodle2#authentication
>>>
>>> -Hannes
>>>
>>
>> I checked the source, if the permissions are set correctly, then the
>> required code change is minimal:
>> in the php-wiki/dokuwiki/lib/plugins/doodle/syntax.php file we have to
>> modify the render and castVote methods to check
>> $this->isAllowedToEditEntry($fullname) and thats it.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ferenc Kovács
>> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>>
>
> of course the explicit group checking would be better, because
> currently we have votes under rfc namespace where some users have
> write access as they proposed/wanted to propose some rfc but they
> shouldn't .
I think we should be able to differentiate the voters manually this time.
But implementing those voting RFC rules before next time would be ideal.
-Hannes