Re: Re: [Patches]#36944, #54556, #55211(and svn karma applying)
| From: | Gustavo Lopes | Date: | Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:06:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [Patches]#36944, #54556, #55211(and svn karma applying) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-54205@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Em Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:42:50 +0100, Laruence <laruence@php.net> escreveu:
2011/7/25 Laruence <laruence@php.net>:Looks good, but I didn't got through it thoroughly to check the consistency of the signs.Hi: recently I was working on PHP bugs. and submit 3 patches,#36944 strncmp & negative len https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=36944
Won't this be affected? <?php $foo[] = 'bar'; I don't see a good reason for this not to be allowed.#54556 array access to empty var does not trigger a notice https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54556
Looks good.#55211 ArrayObject::getArrayObject () should skip proteced or private properties https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55211
#55128 SplFixedArray::fromArray() does not use extended classThis doesn't look like a good idea. The constructor is not called (and in general can't be, since we can't know how the subclass constructor looks like), so the new object can be in an illegal state. -- Gustavo Lopes