Re: [RFC] Function autoloading through spl_autoload*

Hi, 2011/8/12 Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Ryan McCue <lists@rotorised.com> wrote: > > Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > >> I would like to introduce this RFC which would provide function > >> autoloading through the spl_autoload facility without userland BC > >> breakage. > > > > Shouldn't the default type be T_CLASS|T_INTERFACE? > > > > sorry for the late reply. > judging from your reply and the conversion on irc with Etienne, I > think that the usage of the token constants are ambiguous(we have > different token constants for classes and interfaces as you mentioned > for example). > originally I chose this because this would be fully backward > compatible, but now I think that we should add new constants. > what do you think? > From the users point of view I don't care. It's just another constant. Also constants like SPL_AUTOLOAD_CLASS SPL_AUTOLOAD_FUNCTION SPL_AUTOLOAD_CONSTANT seems to be more obvious, because it reflects, that it belongs to spl-autoload. > > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >