Re: libxml returns codes and xmlreader

Hi! > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:27, Nicolai Scheer <scope@planetavent.de> > wrote: >> I've >> noticed, that some of the libxml return codes >> get >> "simplified" when used in xmlreader which can be quite >> problematic. > Use libxml_get_errors() So you're suggesting to call another function rather than returning something that is already there? I see how libxml_get_errors() can be used to work around this, but to my mind, this function should not be called unless I know that in fact there are errors. Nevertheless, is there a "real" reason why this is not implemented? Anyone else feeling uncomfortable with "calling additional functions to check for error conditions"? Greetings, Nico