Re: APC in 5.4

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > > On 9/12/11 5:09 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >> >> The agreement to include apc in 5.4 is an old one, unfortunately the >> action of doing was just missed. Also, inclusion of the extension >> won't break any code since it is self contained... > > If it's an "old one", how comes nobody ever mentioned it during all the > extensive process of naming features, voting, etc. and didn't bother to > propose it? There was a discussion and the conclusion was that APC was not ready for inclusion. See my other reply. > I don't feel good about first agreeing to a set of rules and then > immediately starting to throw them away "just this time, just for this > occasion". Why have rules and release cycles then? -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org