Re: __constructor parameter limitations.

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> On 9/17/11 6:27 AM, Richard Quadling wrote: >> > With the recent BC with regard the locking of the constructor's >> > signature for subclasses, what is the expected mechanism for allowing >> > a subclass to have additional parameters? >> >> I think the whole "strict parameters" thing has gone into somewhat wrong >> direction and now we seem to have tons of useless errors and restrictions. > > If you don't want those warnings, turn them off! That's why there is a > specific error level for it. Well, that won't help for fatal error, which is what's this discussion is all about, or almost :) -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org