Re: open_basedir bypass -> errata tempnam()

Am 28.09.2011 17:03, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: >> please configure the mailing-list correct >> please add a hint that modern clients have a "reply-to-list" > > for the record, I don't have that in gmail. > >> please add a hint that the sender should be removed after >> reply-all because "internals@lists.php.net" is reaching the >> list AND the sender of the post where you write your answer > > and what if the sender is not subscribed to the list? then he can usually not send to a list > I don't get two emails in gmail, I don't know that the list is smart > enough to not send emails those who are to or cc'ed, or maybe it's a > gmail feature. you get them not if the person who answered was smart enough to use "reply to list" or deleted the second address >> using "reply-to-list" will only answer to the mailinglist >> this is why the following headers exists >> >> list-help: <mailto:internals-help@lists.php.net> >> list-unsubscribe: >> <mailto:internals-unsubscribe@lists.php.net> >> list-post: <mailto:internals@lists.php.net> >> List-Id: internals.lists.php.net > > thats not the main reason why those headers exists AFAIK, but I agree > that it could be used for reply-to-list > > as I mentioned before, nobody knows every participant in the list, so > if you reply someone, it is better to not only send it to the list.but > to that person also, because you don't know that he is on the list or > not. normally you have to subscribe for sending to a list and i would wonder if every spambot can anonymously post to php-devel, so if somebody sends to the list he also receives it Am 28.09.2011 17:05, schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf: > Reindl, please read > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > The list is configured correctly well and there i read the text below and that was the reason why i said last night PLEASE reply only to the list because i need not every message twice and answering to the wrong duplicate leaves the list out, one of you both mails has "reply to list" and the other copy not, if i use the other copy you get a lonely answer leaving the list out of rcpt >>> But it already is easy. Reasonable mail programs have two separate "reply" >>> commands: >>> one that replies directly to the author of a message, and another that replies to the >>> author plus all of the list recipients. Even the lowly Berkeley Mail command has had >>> this for about a decade.

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc