Re: BC break in 5.4, extending internal class

hi, On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote: > The change I did in 5.4 should be reverted and synced with 5.3 in the > short term because it doesn't work reliably (even not considering the BC > break) -- there are other methods for getting an invalid instance (the new > reflection method and unserialize, at least). Please do the revert, as you did the commit in the 1st place. As far as I remember we have discussed this issue back then already as well. > But even in 5.3, there are in SPL counter-measures that don't work > reliably, like making a check in get_method. Right, but that's another concern and the same cautiousness should be taken there. Thanks! -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org