Re: SplClassLoader and PSR-0 break language semantics

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:07 AM, <mario@include-once.org> wrote: > 2011/10/26 Matthew Weier O'Phinney <weierophinney@php.net>: >> >> My main point, however, is that the standard was ratified quite some >> time ago already -- we just now have parties interested in creating a >> C-level implementation compatible with the standard to (a) make usage >> simpler, and (b) better optimize performance. We should not be debating >> the standard here, just the implementation. >> > > I'd like to object there. Now that we are discussing it on an open mailing > list again, both seem actually quite relevant. Well, my personal opinion here is that you should discuss that in an open list somewhere and put the RFC together, with examples, docs and updated patch. The internals list is not really well suited to discuss that, while I won't mind to have such discussions here, it may make more sense to have a dedicated list. As it won't be the last discussion you will have :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org