Re: Load extensions for .user.ini files

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 22:43, Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@mit.edu> wrote: > Excerpts from Rasmus Lerdorf's message of Fri Nov 11 15:45:27 -0500 2011: >> Well, it is simple enough that we don't really need a patch. However, >> generally if you want to submit a patch it needs to be against a current >> svn branch and not an old release. You want to minimize the work people >> will need to do to look at your suggested change. > > Gotcha. > >> The other issue with your patch is that you are enabling this for the >> fpm sapi. I thought we agreed that this should only be in the sapis that >> supported dl() and those are cgi, cli and embed. And .user.ini doesn't >> apply to embed, so it would just be cli and cgi because these are the >> non-persistent cases where there is no danger of screwing up the next >> request with a bad extension in a .user.ini file. > > Hmm, it looks like cli doesn't have .user.ini support at all.  Does this > mean we should implement .user.ini for these SAPIs? I'd be in favor. Hmh. Whats the difference between .user.ini and -dextension=? I hate it when bucketloads of .ini files are picked up when I run PHP via cli -Hannes