Re: Multiple Visibility Level Getters/Setters

From: Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:12:19 +0000
Subject: Re: Multiple Visibility Level Getters/Setters
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-56435@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
personally i think only public should be done with this method all others should be follow the __set/__get method, since if you need special rules, then they would be set-able by a public method On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Lars Strojny <lars@strojny.net> wrote: > Just throw an error if conflicting accessors are defined. In the case of > subtypes: accessors may broaden the interface, but not limit it => LSP. So > it’s fine to make a parents protected accessor public, but not the other > way around. > > Am 19.11.2011 um 02:46 schrieb Clint M Priest: > > > What would everyone think about multiple levels of visibility for > getters/setters? > > > > class Sample { > > > > public $Variable { > > public get { return "Public"; } > > protected get { return "Protected"; } > > private get { return "Private"; } > > > > public set { ... } > > private set { ... } > > } > > } > > > > Whichever getter/setter would be called with the most restricted access, > so externally public, internally protected (if inherited) or private from > within. > > > > Any value to this? I can see some use cases and wouldn't be any more > difficult to implement into what I'm already doing. > > > > -Clint > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.internals (#56435) next »