Re: Any chance of having __invokeStatic()

From: Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:11:28 +0000
Subject: Re: Any chance of having __invokeStatic()
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-56658@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
How would this be different from defining a function MyClass? Nikita On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Dmitri Snytkine <dsnytkine@ultralogistics.com> wrote: > I think __invokeStatic() would be a very useful magic function, especially > with support for late static binding. > you could difine it one and all sub-classes will have that option of > basically being callable classes. > > MyClass($params) could then do some processing and return some data. > > This would basically be the same as doing MyClass::doSomething($params); > only without the extra typing of ::doSomething

« previous php.internals (#56658) next »