Re: Patch: getters/setters syntax Implementation

From: Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:04:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Patch: getters/setters syntax Implementation
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-56765@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
2011/12/4 Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > 2011/12/4 Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>: >> Updated patch w/o white-space: >> http://www.clintpriest.com/patches/accessors_v1.patch >> >> In the end it is a relatively simple patch.  The new syntax effectively creates internal >> functions on the object and the system looks for those functions and calls them at the appropriate >> time. >> >> Example: >> class z { >>        public $Hours { >>                        public get { return $this->_Hours; } >>                        protected set { $this->_Hours = $value; } >>        } >> } >> >> Defines: >> $o->__getHours(); >> $o->__setHours($value); >> >> Standard __get()/__set() functionality checks for the more specifically defined function >> name and calls them.  I thought this would make the most sense since it would allow us to leverage >> the existing inheritance functionality.  This comes out with respect to interfaces and traits in >> that only errors had to be changed (for clarity) on interfaces and no changes to traits were >> necessary to support the new functionality. >> >> For the automatic get/set functionality, I essentially built the function body myself >> within zend_do_end_accessor_declaration().  One point of contention here is that internally it >> defines a __$Hours property which would be accessible from various points.  I believe the standard >> C# get/set does not allow any access to the underlying data storage.  In order to accomplish that >> there would need to be some non-standard storage or a super-private level or something.  I did not >> explore that possibility as of yet. >> >> I did add a couple of convenience functions that may already be available in some other >> form I was not aware of, such as strcatalloc or MAKE_ZNODE(). >> >> --Clint >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 4:50 AM >> To: Clint M Priest >> Cc: internals@lists.php.net >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch: getters/setters syntax Implementation >> >> hi Clint! >> >> >> Thanks for your work so far! >> >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com> wrote: >> >>> What are the next steps to get this added to some future release? >> >> Let discuss the  implementation and how it works, then you can move to the voting phase. >> There is no need to hurry as the next release where this patch could go in is next year. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | >> http://www.libgd.org >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > > I've fixed the zend_compile.c and zend_object_handlers.c to build with > --enable-maintainer-zts. (some TSRMLS_CC missing and TSRMLS_DC usage > instead of TSRMLS_CC) > Other thing I have noticed that you have not followed our coding > standards about brackets and comments (we don't use the C++ style > one). And about the comments looks as the patch isn't finished or you > just forgot the remove them? > > http://dpaste.com/665851/plain/ > > -- > Regards, > Felipe Pena Check out also the failing tests in Zend/tests/* (including segmentation fault) -- Regards, Felipe Pena

« previous php.internals (#56765) next »