Re: Re: another fix for max_input_vars.

From: Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:11:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: another fix for max_input_vars.
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-57231@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote: >> On 01/04/2012 11:49 PM, Laruence wrote: >>> Hi: >>>   there is one way  maybe is a good try. >>> >>>   when resize hashtable,  we don't just dobule the size,  instead, we >>> increase the hashtable size with a random delta >>> >>>  what do you think? >> >> Sorry, you lost me. How does that help? The problem is when we collide >> on a single hash key the resulting linked list traversion gets longer >> and longer as more colliding keys are added to that hashtable. Whether >> you double the size or grow it by some other factor doesn't change this. > No, No, > > if we increase the table size with a random delta(the nTableMask will > also be random), then the collision will not be predictable. I have made a patch, plz try this mechanism, https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug_id=60655&patch=rand_hash_resize.patch&revision=latest I have tested , that works. and the patch is still a rough draft, so maybe some compile warnings.. thanks > > thanks > >> >> -Rasmus >> > > > > -- > Laruence  Xinchen Hui > http://www.laruence.com/ -- Laruence  Xinchen Hui http://www.laruence.com/

« previous php.internals (#57231) next »