Re: REQUEST_TIME change in PHP 5.4

From: Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:07:57 +0000
Subject: Re: REQUEST_TIME change in PHP 5.4
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-57249@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>wrote: > >> 2011/12/27 Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@ilia.ws>: >> > The change is inside 5.4 version which adjust breaks BC. >> >> I don't follow you here Ilia. >> >> As per https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess: >> * "Backward compatibility must be respected with the same major >> releases, for example from 5.2 to 5.6." >> * Going from x.y.z to x.y+1.z, it is ok to break *binary* >> compatibility but "Backward compatibility must be kept". >> >> However: >> >> new DateTime("@{$_SERVER['REQUEST_TIME']}"); >> >> works in 5.3 but not in 5.4. >> AFAIK, creating a DateTime object based on the REQUEST_TIME is not an >> exotic thing. >> For sure, the fix is easy, but that is not the point, it *will* >> actually break applications. >> >> Did I miss something? > > > I think that he is referring to that we already break BC with 5.4 > (removing magic_quotes, register_globals, break/continue > $var, allow_call_time_pass_reference, some deprecated session_ functions, > safe_mode, etc. for a complete list see > > http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_4/UPGRADING?view=markup > ) > These are mostly removal of features, and most of these have been deprecated for quite a while. The REQUEST_TIME change however is a change of behaviour that has not been warned about up front, which imo is a worse BC break then most of the rest. And arguing for ignoring one bc break/bug/mistake because there are others is.. well.. :) > > However I tend to agree with you, that this BC break isn't really worth > it, we can see that there are common apps stumbling across this change, and > albeit the new behavior can be useful for many people, they wouldn't really > mind if we add this as a new variable imo. > Great, so I do think most people agree that this can, and should be fixed before 5.4 by instead expose microtime on a separate variable called REQUEST_TIME_FLOAT. +1

« previous php.internals (#57249) next »