Re: Change bug tracker "bogus" to "not-bug"?
| From: | Charlie Somerville | Date: | Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:21:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Change bug tracker "bogus" to "not-bug"? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-57498@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It'd also be nice to see a more receptive approach to bug reports. It's concerning that so
many legitimate bug reports get labelled as bogus for whatever reason.
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Fonda wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Paul Dragoonis <dragoonis@gmail.com
> (mailto:dragoonis@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Christopher Jones
> > <christopher.jones@oracle.com (mailto:christopher.jones@oracle.com)> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 01/24/2012 03:11 PM, Justin Martin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as
> > > > they
> > > > are reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for
> > > > documentation problems, where someone has misunderstood what the
> > > > documentation says, or hasn't read the documentation
> > > > thoroughly enough.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to propose simply changing the term "bogus" to
> > > > "not-bug". This
> > > > would more politely and clearly indicate the nature of the way the bug is
> > > > being closed, in addition to the comment that one ordinarily leaves.
> > > >
> > > > Those I've spoken to in php.doc agree. Any objections?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Justin Martin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on this. It's time for a new, more collaborative approach.
> >
> > Sure, I'll +1 on this. The "bogus" implies "RTFM, bitch", which
> > isn't
> > professional at all :-)
> >
>
>
> I've felt this way for a long time. Big +1 on changing this.
>
> Cheers,
> --Matthew
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>