Re: Re: [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC

Hi! > As Stas suggested earlier, it would help if you can convince one > person having voted none or both to choose the empty only option, then > you should be good. It is not that good in general, but for 1/3 of a > voice for something like that ... :) AFAIK 2 of the people voting "both" (myself included) already said they are OK with "empty only". But in general, what is happening now is exactly what I was concerned about when we have started this voting thing - that decision becomes matter of formal incidents having nothing to do... well, with anything on the merits of the proposal. Support we lack one vote and do not implement it - then we didn't implement a feature because somebody who could add one crucial vote was on vacation or too busy or missed the email. I don't think it's a good situation. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227