Re: boolval() again

From: Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 07:41:03 +0000
Subject: Re: boolval() again
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-60773@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
hi Gustavo, On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote: > Adding a function or class most definitely is not a language change (unless > they have some special treatment like Iterator), unless you consider all the > core functions and classes to be part of the language, at which point > everything is a language change. boolval like other type related functions are not languages constructs per se but parts of the very core of PHP, so same treatment applies. > An RFC for such a trivial change is an utter waste of time IMO. I would not say waste of time, but for the long term record and clarity, a RFC should always be written, no matter how short (i.e. boolval) or long (i.e. intl additions) it is. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.internals (#60773) next »