Re: Re: Generators in PHP
| From: | Yahav Gindi Bar | Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:42:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Generators in PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-61707@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 24 ביול 2012, at 20:35, Andrew Faulds wrote:
> On 24/07/12 18:34, Alex Aulbach wrote:
>> 2012/7/23 Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>:
>>> Curious if you could expand on that. Generators are iterators, so not sure
>>> what you're asking for.
>> It's the point which is unlogical for me. Maybe it's a question. If
>> the generator is an object with the implementation of an iterator, why
>> do we need to have it as _function_?
>>
> Much easier to make an iterator with a function than as a class.
>
> --
> Andrew Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
I agree, implementing a class only for iterator may be pain sometimes, and functions is much better
- especially when 5.3 got the anonymous functions, so we can even use the generators for iterator
functions in class methods which can be great.