Re: oci in pecl...
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Tue, 09 Dec 2003 20:16:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: oci in pecl... | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-6312@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -0000
> > "Wez Furlong" <wez@thebrainroom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > > independent from the main-tree. (also - don't forget - not too
> > > > many ppls use oracle, and those who do would be more than happy
> > > > to get new features/improvemnt from a new maintainer)
> > >
> > > This is precisely what I want to encourage in PECL.
> >
> > Fully aggreed (if that count ;) ). I really like the idea to work on
> > package release basis in preference of "horrible" CVS tags ;).
>
> For this to work pear install <pecl package> needs to work first.
Tomas and I asked many times the help of internals guys and posted a RFC
for binary packages :). But I missed the install error, damnit :P
> Try "pear install tidy" -> doesn't work, while "pear download tidy"
> works fine.
http://pear.php.net/bugs/ is a good start :-D
> And as the pear installer has as much docs as the Zend
> engine... I've no time/clue on where to start looking for the problem
> ;-)
docs? what's that?
pierre