Re: constructor hook

On Sep 19, 2012 4:31 AM, "Kris Craig" <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Amaury Bouchard <amaury@amaury.net> wrote: > > > Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object > > construction. > > Take a look at: https://github.com/AOP-PHP/AOP > > > > > Yeah I wasn't aware of this, either, but I can think of several scenarios > in which it'd be useful. I know this is PECL, but is this something that > might be worth bundling? I'm still a bit new here so if that idea's heresy > please let me know. If not, that would be a nice feature to have on a > default installation I think. Thoughts? Why not, 2 solutions here : - Bundle it with PHP sources - Merge it with core (trunk) I think that it may need more code to bind AOP functionnalities to Reflection though. Anyway, an RFC will be needed ;) Julien.Pauli On Sep 19, 2012 4:31 AM, "Kris Craig" <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Amaury Bouchard <amaury@amaury.net> > wrote: > > > Sounds to me like aspect-oriented programming, applied to object > > construction. > > Take a look at: https://github.com/AOP-PHP/AOP > > > > > Yeah I wasn't aware of this, either, but I can think of several scenarios > in which it'd be useful. I know this is PECL, but is this something that > might be worth bundling? I'm still a bit new here so if that idea's heresy > please let me know. If not, that would be a nice feature to have on a > default installation I think. Thoughts? > > <tangent>@Ferenc Yes congrats on cherry-picking a few recent posts that > weren't Nobel Prize material (some of which did make constructive points > when viewed in context, albeit with some creative flair). I'm not in the > market for a nanny right now; I'll let you know if that ever changes. If > you'd like to discuss your personal feelings about this further, please do > so via private email so we don't spam the list.</tangent> > > --Kris >