Re: [RFC] Accessors v1.1 -> v1.2 Summary

On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Clint Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com> wrote: > Hey everyone, seems like the conversations have died down and I've attempted to go back > through all of the emails and produce a 1.1 -> 1.2 document which summarizes what I believe are > decided, being debated, issues, todos, etc. > > Pierre had pointed out that I had partially changed the "as-implemented" document > which no longer reflected what the fork implements. So... I have reverted that document to the 1.1 > version. You can use branches as well, and refer to them in the RFC. Going back and forth and loosing track or ability to test a given feature or option is not that good to evaluate the choices :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org