Re: [RFC] Accessors : read-only / write-only keywords

Hi! > Class A created property accessor $z that you can not set. Class B can > extend me just fine, but they can not alter that basic rule that I laid > out for my and all my children's property accessor $z: You can not set it. I'm fine with the idea of methods that are not overrideable, even though I think the real use case for it is not that big. I'm less fine with the idea of methods that are not definable. Whole "final NULL" business seems weird to me. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227