Re: [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 : Internal Accessor Method Visibility / Callability

Hi! > an accessor setter method for a property $_state IF that method would > follow the __set$PROPNAME pattern. As a solution for that, I'd propose > naming the new magic methods with a so-far-not-taken common prefix: __prop > - i.e. name them __prop_get_xxx, __prop_set_xxx, and so on. I think it'd more natural to make it __set__PROPNAME. Though __set_state is a static method, so maybe we can live with it - except that you won't be able to declare property named $_state. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227