Re: [VOTE RESULT] ext/mysql deprecation in 5.5
| From: | Kris Craig | Date: | Fri, 07 Dec 2012 07:03:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE RESULT] ext/mysql deprecation in 5.5 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-64192@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Adam Harvey <aharvey@php.net> wrote:
> All,
>
> I ended up leaving the vote open for a couple of extra days (been a
> busy week), but I've now closed the ext/mysql deprecation vote. The
> full results are at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/mysql_deprecation
> — the
> short version is that the final vote was 25-12 in favour of
> deprecation in PHP 5.5.
>
> This made the second question moot, but for the record, the result
> there was 26-12 in favour of option (a) (deprecation in PHP 5.6 if not
> in PHP 5.5).
>
> I'd like to apologise for not updating the RFC sooner to attempt to
> capture the new arguments made on Internals against deprecation — I've
> made an attempt at doing so (without getting deeply into the back and
> forth that took place) now that I've had a bit of time, but if anyone
> feels misrepresented or would like to detail their argument for
> posterity better, please feel free to edit the RFC.
>
> I intend to commit the patch along with the relevant test updates in
> the next few days. Admittedly, I'm bad with timeframes, so please
> don't hang me if it slips a little. It'll be in before beta 1, I
> promise.
>
> Thanks to everyone who participated in the discussion, and
> particularly to those who voted. And particularly particularly to Ulf
> for going well above and beyond in writing a monster blog post on the
> matter (and for his correspondence and help off-list).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adam, who is serious about that whole beer offer in an earlier e-mail,
> no matter how you voted.
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
Considering the complexity and widely divergent views on this subject, I
think your handling of this RFC was quite exemplary. This was a very big
decision and you assumed a leadership role in getting it addressed. I
don't think any apologies are necessary in this instance. =)
--Kris