Re: Re: [RFC][vote] 5.3 EOL
| From: | Florian Anderiasch | Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:37:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC][vote] 5.3 EOL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-65117@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 01/21/2013 11:44 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:
> Pierre,
>
> Can you review this RFC and the votes? The wording "5.5 final
> release" needs assessing. You probably meant "first 5.5 production
> release". If anyone interpreted it as it is actually written
> i.e. "terminal 5.5 release", then the vote needs to be re-run.
How do you plan to find out who would've taken it that way? Ask all who
voted?
Maybe it sounds more ambiguous for a native speaker, but I actually had
to reread this mail to get your point. I've never heard anyone use
"final" as "terminal", the "final" in the software development domain
has always been the name for the version after the RCs, at least for me.
Greetings,
Florian