Re: I think that "Function naming inconsistency" bug deservers more attention
| From: | Sebastian Krebs | Date: | Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:56:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: I think that "Function naming inconsistency" bug deservers more attention | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-65170@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2013/1/25 Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Martin Keckeis
> <martin.keckeis1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > you are right Damian.
> >
> > Also today on a german page:
> >
>
> http://it-republik.de/php/news/Machen-wir-das-Namensschema-der-PHP-Funktionen-einheitlich%21-066539.html
> >
> > Relating to this bug report:
> > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52424
>
> We all know that, since years. The answer however remains the same: We
> can't do it without major backward compatibility breakages. Please
> check the internals archive for the past discussions.
>
Theoretically you can have both: The API in it's current state as well as a
consistent api in the "php"-namespace.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
github.com/KingCrunch