Re: Re: O+ 1st results

I assume that something is functionally wrong on Symfony/O+: Symfony, IIS, cache, PHP5.5.0devvc11: 2195 Symfony, IIS, cache, PHP5.5.0devvc11: 1919 Symfony, IIS, cache, PHP5.5.0devvc11: 2127 There was a previous report that Twig did not work at all with optimizations enabled. Damien On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote: >> Pierre Joye in php.internals (Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:54:03 +0100): >>>On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote: >> >>>>> http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20130213-5.4.11-5.5.0devvc11.html >>>> >>>> Is that the column 5.5.0devvc11 under APC -igbinary? I have a Drupal7 >>>> site running on my devserver (W2K8, Apache 2.4.3, PHP 5.3.21 TS as >>>> mod_fcgid) and do not get the idea it is running at one third (21.9 / >>>> 69.4) of the speed of the same site without any cache at all. >>> >>>No, but O+ is broken right now in ZTS, it makes no sense to do further >>>testing before it works for more than 0.5 request ;) >>> >>>But running TS builds in FCGI reduces drastically the issues due to >>>thread safety bugs, while it makes no sense to use them, fcgi and the >>>likes should rely on NTS builds. ZTS will do all kind of locks where >>>it is absolutely not required, that explains at least 15-20% of the >>>perf drop, virtual paths cover the rest. >> >> I will try to compare the same site side-by-side with different configs. >> The dev-server has 4 IPv4=adresses which gives a lot of config options. >> >>>>>Mediawiki is slower because it does not support yet O+ for usercache, >>>>>along other things. >>>> >>>> Is the same the case with Symfony? >>> >>>no, MediaWiki caching modules only support APC or Wincache so far. >> >> Is the performance drop for Symfony in the Wincache test due to the fact >> that wincache is optimized for IIS or are there other reasons? > > Did not analyze it yet. > > WinCache is not IIS optimized but FastCGI (read: process based). Also > we did not enabled file IO cache, which could bring it up in line. > But as neither APC or O+ have it, it cannot be compared. > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >