Re: [RFC] Short syntax for anonymous functions

From: Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:56:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Short syntax for anonymous functions
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-65952@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Marcello, Am 19.02.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Marcello Duarte <mduarte@inviqa.com>: > Thanks for the feedback. I get most people here don't appreciate the value of the feature. > > I can understand that If you haven't tried to write a tool like capistrano, rspec, chef, > puppet, etc, etc in PHP you probably won't see much value in implementing such things. > > On 19 Feb 2013, at 13:19, Derick Rethans wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Marcello Duarte wrote: >> >>> Inspired by Sara, here is another RFC, I finally got around to draft: >>> >>> >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-syntax-for-anonymous-function I don’t like the syntax, but the proposal in general. If you compare PHPs syntax to various others, it is indeed clumsy. Python: map(lambda v: v * 2, [1, 2, 3]) Ruby: [1, 2, 3].map{|x| x * 2} Scala: List(1, 2, 3).map((x: Int) => x * 2) PHP: array_map(function ($x) {return $x * 2;}, [1, 2, 3]); So even a statically typed language like Scala is shorter and better to read. A good improvement would be implicit return and getting rid of the function keyword. array_map(($x): $x * 2;, [1, 2, 3]); But this RFC should come with a patch, otherwise we are discussing things that aren’t necessarily easy to implement. cu, Lars

« previous php.internals (#65952) next »