Re: Dropping requirement for `function` keyword for methods in classes/interfaces/etc
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:01:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Dropping requirement for `function` keyword for methods in classes/interfaces/etc | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-65998@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Are we really trying to look under ground now for ways to change the
language syntax?
Unless there's a strong case to adding/removing/changing syntax, that
goes well beyond 'because we can' or 'it shortens the code' it
shouldn't even be brought up for discussion.
Zeev
On 19 בפבר 2013, at 19:44, Nikita Nefedov <inefedor@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As someone mentioned in the thread about short syntax for closures, we could also drop
> requirement for
function keyword when defining/declaring methods in
> classes, interfaces or traits.
>
> I have long noticed how redundant it is. The patch is pretty easy as it was with commas :)
> It is absolutely backwards compatible (you can use function or
> you can not use it). Here's the patch:
> https://gist.github.com/nikita2206/4988075
>
> If people will welcome this proposal, I would need some karma for making RFC.
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>